Search This Blog

Wednesday, April 2, 2025

The Law, Continued

For Monday: Lowi, ch. 9.

Election in Wisconsin

The Court System



Edwards v Aguillard


Decision and opinions

Edwards v. Aguillard oral argument (start around 26:00)

From Topkis's comments -- an example of the value of slow reading:

Now, this bill was of course drafted by a theologian, or somebody versed in apologetics.
There's an amusing bit of evidence on that subject in the very language of the bill.
The bill keeps using... the Act keeps using the term "evidences" in the plural.
We lawyers never speak of "evidences" in the plural. We speak of "evidence", the singular.
And I got nagged by it, and I looked it up the other day.
And of course the only dictionary reference to "evidences" is to Christian apologetics: the evidences for Christianity. This is a matter of theological disputation.
Tocqueville (p. 267): "Nothing could be more obscure and out of reach of the common man than a law founded on precedent…. A French lawyer is just a man of learning, but an English or an American one is somewhat like the Egyptian priests, being, as they were, the only interpreters of an occult science."

Debate over court makeup

Judicial activism (Lowi 2665-268)

KBJ




Blue Slips and Senatorial Courtesy (Lowis 247-248)



Monday, March 31, 2025

The Law

 For next time:  

Two words to know about the law:  legal fees.

Some basic distinctions


The Dangers of the Law
Trials and Juries
Juries invest each citizen with a sort of magisterial office; they make all men feel that they have duties toward society and that they take a share in its government. By making men pay attention to things other than their own affairs, they combat that individual selfishness which is like rust in society.
Juries are wonderfully effective in shaping a nation’s judgment and increasing its natural lights. That, in my view, is its greatest advantage. It should be regarded as free school which is always open and in which each juror learns his rights, comes into daily contact with the best-educated and most-enlightened members of the upper classes, and is given practical lessons in the law, lessons which the advocate’s efforts, the judge’s advice, and also the very passions of the litigants bring within his mental grasp. I think that the main reason for the practical intelligence and the political good sense of the Americans is their long experience with juries in civil cases.
Civil, Criminal, and Public Law (Lowis, 242)
  • Even if they win acquittal in a criminal cases, defendants might still face civil suits. See O.J. Simpson
State and Local Judges
Federal Judges


Appellate Courts

Wednesday, March 26, 2025

Executive Branch: Issues and Problems

For Monday:

Atlantic article and The Signal Chat

Robert Gates (Sec Def under Bush 43 and Obama), Duty: Memoirs of a  Secretary at War, p. 82.

The secretary of defense is second only to the president in the military chain of command (neither the vice president nor the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff is in the chain at all), and any order to American forces worldwide goes from the president to the secretary directly to the combatant commanders (although as a practical matter and a courtesy, I routinely asked the chairman to convey such orders). More important than any of the meetings, the secretary makes life-and-death decisions every day—and not just for American military forces. Since 9/11, the president has delegated to the secretary the authority to shoot down any commercial airliner he, the secretary, deems to be a threat to the United States. The secretary can also order missiles fired to shoot down an incoming missile.

What does it mean that information is classified?

FROM DOD:





Review from last time:

Things that federal bureaucracies do (categories overlap).  It's complicated!

Tocqueville (p. 692) on "The Sort of Despotism Democratic Nations Have to Fear"

It provides for their security, foresees and supplies their necessities, facilitates their pleasures, manages their principle concerns, directs their industry, makes rules for their testaments, and divides their inheritances. Why should it not entirely relieve them from the trouble of thinking and all the cares of living?…It covers the whole of social life with a network of petty, complicated rules that are both minute and uniform, through which even men of the greatest originality and the most vigorous temperament cannot force their heads above the crowd. It does not break men’s will, but softens, bends, and guides it; it seldom enjoins, but often inhibits, action; it does not destroy anything, but prevents much being born; it is not at all tyrannical, but it hinders, restrains, enervates, stifles, and stultifies so much that in the end each nation is no more than a flock of timid and hardworking animals with the government as its shepherd.

Volume of federal regulations: 10,000 Commandments, p. 26

 Cost of regulation and benefits of regulation

Control of bureaucracy and the Principal-Agent Problem (Lowi, 222):  "Deep State," iron triangles, issue networks





Monday, March 24, 2025

Executive Branch



Third assignment

For next time, Tocqueville, 690-695

From last time:

Bureaucracy: the complex structure of offices, tasks, rules, and principles of organization that large-scale institutions use to coordinate the work of their personnel.

A hierarchical organization with a division of labor and specialization.
  • Cabinet departments (e.g., the Department of Agriculture)
  • Independent agencies: agencies that are not part of a Cabinet department but do not have Cabinet status themselves (e.g., EPA).
  • Government corporations: government agencies that operate more like  businesses (e.g., US Postal Service)
  • Independent regulatory commissions: rule-making bodies that technically have some insulation from politics (such as the Federal Election Commission)
Bureaucrats are agents of elected officials who have discretion in how they do their jobs.


After Congress passes law, the bureaucracy drafts rules:
Things that federal bureaucracies do (categories overlap).  It's complicated!




Third Assignment, Spring 2025

Choose one:

1.  Explain how a specific federal policy or program has directly affected you or someone close to you.  Was your experience typical?

2.  Explain how a specific judicial decision has directly affected you or someone close to you. Was this experience typical?

3. With a focus on DOGE, write a brief update to chapter 7.  In what ways would the textbook authors have to revise their analysis of bureaucracy? 

4.  Courts have blocked or delayed many of the current administration's executive actions. Pick one such case.  Explain the arguments on each side with reference to the concepts of "judicial activism" (Lowi 265) and judicial review (Lowi 255).  Which side is likely to prevail in the end?


Instructions:

  • Document your claims. Do not write from the top of your head. Cite the specific rules, statutes, or judicial decisions that you are discussing.
  • Essays should be double-spaced and no more than three pages long. I will not read past the third page.
  • Essays should be in the form of Word documents.  Do not submit pdfs or Google docs.
  • Cite your sources with endnotes in Chicago/Turabian style. Endnote pages do not count against the page limit.
  • Do not use ChatGPT or any other generative AI. Misrepresenting AI-generated content as your own work is plagiarism.  It will result in a referral to the Academic Standards Committee.  
  • Watch your spelling, grammar, diction, and punctuation. Errors will count against you.
  • Turn in essays to  Canvas by 11:59 PM,  Monday, April 7:  note the extra time. (If you have trouble with Canvas, simply email your essay to me as an attached Word file.) I reserve the right to dock essays a gradepoint for one day’s lateness, a full letter grade after that.

Wednesday, March 12, 2025

Presidency II

"Air midterm"

For a week from Monday, read Lowi, ch. 7

What the real Oval Office looks like

Tocqueville 127: "In America the President cannot prevent the making of laws; he cannot escape his obligation to execute them."  IS THAT STATEMENT STILL TRUE?


Legislative presidency
  • Vetoes
  • Federalist 73"But the convention have pursued a mean in this business, which will both facilitate the exercise of the power vested in this respect in the executive magistrate, and make its efficacy to depend on the sense of a considerable part of the legislative body. Instead of an absolute negative, it is proposed to give the Executive the qualified negative already described. This is a power which would be much more readily exercised than the other."




Congress checking the president: NAIL:
  • Nominations
  • Appropriations
  • Investigations/Impeachment
  • Legislation

"Air Midterm"

Relax. This “air midterm” does not count toward your grade; do not even turn it in. Instead, use it to appraise your own progress in the course. Try out this test, either in your head or on paper. If you flounder, then you should take more care with class sessions and assigned readings.

I. Identifications. Explain the meaning and significance of the following items. Each answer should be a brief paragraph. What is fair game for an identification?

  • Items that we have discussed in class or on the blog;
  • Items that appear in bold or italics in the readings;
  • Items that cover several pages in the readings.

    1. Natural rights
    2. Great Compromise
    3. Eminent domain
    4. Dual citizenship
    5. Social Gospel
    6. The Lemon Test
    7. Fourteenth Amendment
    8. Executive agreements
    9. Indian Citizenship Act
    10. Divided government
    11. Mores
    12. Executive orders

    II. Short answers. Each should be a brief paragraph.

    1.  Briefly explain: “Religion, which never intervenes directly in the government of American society, should therefore be considered as the first of their political institutions, for although it did not give them the taste for liberty, it singularly facilitates their use thereof."

    2. Briefly explain: “[O]f those men who have overturned the iberties of republics, the greatest number have begun their career by paying an obsequious court to the people; commencing demagogues, and ending tyrants.”

    3. Which constitutional amendment was a repsonse to the Antifederalists’ concerns that a strong central government would encroach on the power of the states? How did the amendment address those concerns?


    III. General Essays. Each answer should take 3-4 small bluebook pages.

    1.  According to Tocqueville, what are the main causes that check majority tyranny and maintain a democratic republic in the United States? Does the system work as he described it?

    2. Explain how the Constitution gives power to the president


    IV. Bonus questions (one point each) Very briefly identify the following:

    • Pam Bondi
    • Liz Cheney
    • Eleni Kounalakis
    • Angela Alsbrooks
    • Rosaline Friedman