1.When I read Chapter 8, the Anti-PX Environmental Movement at Xiamen, China appeared in my mind. It may be the largest urban-based demonstrations in China. Residents at Xiamen worried about the toxic PX from a potential chemical plant since 2002 and used mobile phone messages to gather people to protest the chemical plant. The Anti-PX Movement at Xiamen showed that the development of technology did influence the environment of public opinions and political participation in China.
2. Students at Georgetown University analyzed China's missle and nuclear arsenal hiding tunnels through traditionally dependable research resources and online data such as Google Earth and blogs. Though some doubt that online data is not trustful, this research shows that the gigantic information on the Internet has changed the researcing way of security studies.
This blog serves the our introductory course on American politics (Claremont McKenna College Government 20) for the spring of 2025. During the semester, I shall post course material and students will comment on it. Students are also free to comment on any aspect of American politics, either current or historical. There are only two major limitations: no coarse language, and no derogatory comments about people at the Claremont Colleges.
Sunday, March 4, 2012
Wednesday, February 29, 2012
Civil Rights in the United States
Can a prosecutor appeal an "not guilty" verdict? NOPE!
Civil War Amendments
Amendment XIII
Amendment XIV
Amendment XV
Woodrow Wilson's work in a pro-Klan movie:

- Prohibits discrimination in employment on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, or sex.
- Prohibits discrimination in federally funded programs or activities on the basis of race, color, or national origin
- Prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, or national origin in public accommodations.
Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA), enacted shortly after the CRA and which was designed to prevent the disenfranchisement of black voters in the South, prohibits voting practices that discriminate on the basis of race, color, or membership in a language minority group.
The Fair Housing Act (FHA), which was originally enacted in 1968, prohibits discrimination in the sale or rental of housing on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, disability, or familial status.
The Equal Pay Act of 1963 prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex with regard to the compensation paid to men and women for substantially equal work performed in the same establishment
Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. Like Title VI of the CRA, Title IX’s prohibition on discrimination is tied to federal funding. Specifically, Title IX prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in federally funded education programs or activities.
The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in federally conducted and federally funded programs or activities, as well as in employment by the federal government and by federal contractors.
The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), which is the most recently enacted piece of major civil rights legislation in the nation, prohibits discrimination based on disability in employment, public services, public accommodations, transportation, and telecommunications.
Monday, February 27, 2012
Civil Liberties
- Why did the original Constitution not contain a bill of rights? See Federalist #84
- Barron v. Baltimore held that the Bill of Rights did not apply to the states.
- Things changed with "selective incorporation."
- Definition of "strict scrutiny"
The Bill of Rights
Amendment III
No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.
Amendment V
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
Amendment VII
In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.- The First Amendment as an international outlier.
- The Lemon Test
- "Fighting Words"
- Prior restraint
- The Miller Test
Amendment II
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.Amendment III
No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.
Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.Amendment V
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
Amendment VI
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.Amendment VII
In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
Amendment VIII
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.Amendment IX
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.Writing Comments
- Visit The CMC Writing Center
- Introduction of quotations: Quotations should never suddenly appear out of nowhere. Name the author, and where appropriate, give his or her credentials.
- Superscripts and punctuation: Superscript footnote numbers follow punctuation. Use superscript Arabic numerals, not lower-case Romans. Some idiot at Microsoft made the latter the default option, but it is easy to convert to proper format.
- Single and double quotation marks: In American English, use single quotation marks (') only to set off quoted material (or a minor title) inside a quotation. "I think she said `I will try,' not `I won't try,'" explained Sandy.
- Author names in footnotes and endnotes: In Turabian format, the author's first name goes first.
- Tense consistency: In summaries or narration, stick to a single tense unless you intend to indicate a change in time frame.
- Dangling modifiers: A dangling modifier is a word or phrase modifying a word that the sentence does not clearly lay out.
CMC's Admission Policies and the Supreme Court
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/22/us/justices-to-hear-case-on-affirmative-action-in-higher-education.html?scp=1&sq=supreme%20court%20race%20admissions&st=cse
In 2003 the Supreme Court ruled that it was okay for public universities to have race-conscious admission policies. They have just decided to hear another case in which a white student is suing the University of Texas to end this practice. This article explains that by merely agreeing to hear the case, the court signaled that it may be seeking to reverse the decision it made in 2003.
When the SAT scandal occurred there was a lot of discussion about CMC's admission policies. CMC has no explicitly stated goals for the racial demographics of an admitted class, however the admissions office has been trying to increase the population of international students in recent years. I'm not sure this ruling would have any effect on private colleges, but if it did, would it have an impact on CMC's admissions policy? I'm curious whether a policy to promote international diversity could be affected by an affirmative action case like this.
In 2003 the Supreme Court ruled that it was okay for public universities to have race-conscious admission policies. They have just decided to hear another case in which a white student is suing the University of Texas to end this practice. This article explains that by merely agreeing to hear the case, the court signaled that it may be seeking to reverse the decision it made in 2003.
When the SAT scandal occurred there was a lot of discussion about CMC's admission policies. CMC has no explicitly stated goals for the racial demographics of an admitted class, however the admissions office has been trying to increase the population of international students in recent years. I'm not sure this ruling would have any effect on private colleges, but if it did, would it have an impact on CMC's admissions policy? I'm curious whether a policy to promote international diversity could be affected by an affirmative action case like this.
Liberties and Rights
As Chinese Vice President Xi concluded his
visit to the U.S., the takeaways of the trip are still being debated. However,
on Feb 20th, the day of his return to China, the Chinese social network
underwent shock as some Chinese ‘netizens’ gained access to Google+. Surprisingly,
the first thing on their list was to “occupy” U.S. President Barack Obama’s
Google+ page. ‘Netizens’ flocked to Obama’s page, posting hundreds of comments underneath
each of his campaign updates. Due to the restriction on the number of comments,
‘netizens' even discussed the possibility of occupying Mitt Romney’s page. Although, a few ‘netizens’ have stressed on
U.S. intervention of releasing Chinese civil rights activists under house
arrest, most left trivial posts as evidence of their new gained privilege. For
them, the significance of posting comments surpasses the context of these
comments.
Freedom of speech in China is sometimes
more of a privilege than a right, or a civil liberty as viewed in the United
States. Some people forget they are entitled to speak freely, more
importantly, their responsibility in speaking up against the wrongdoings of
authorities and corporations. However, the entire population of the United
States was not given the same civil liberties and rights since the founding of
the country, as demonstrated through the inequalities of African-Americans,
women and minorities in chapter seven. For African-Americans, why did Rosa
Parks and Martin Luther King Jr. trigger civil rights movements a century after
the Emancipation Proclamation? If decades of inequality and segregation lay the
foundation for these movements, why was the outburst in the 1950s to 1960s? For
a society without segregation or obvious inequality, what fosters the sense of
civil liberties and rights leading to movements and possibly political change?
Wednesday, February 22, 2012
Second Assignment
Below is your second assignment. Each of you has a different Supreme Court case dealing with citizenship, civil liberties, civil rights, or voting rights. In your essay, tell why the case was significant. Specifically, answer these questions:
Before writing it, re-read Strunk and White. Also see my writing advice, which in turn contains links to model papers.
Do research to document your claims. Do not write from the top of your head. Your paper must cite at least three hardcopy or microform books or government publications. In other words, you must go to the library.
You may find relevant links here.
- What was the issue?
- What was the historical and legal context?
- What was the long-term legal and political impact of the case?
Before writing it, re-read Strunk and White. Also see my writing advice, which in turn contains links to model papers.
- Chris Albanese, North Haven Board of Education v. Bell
- Ratik Asokan, Plyler v. Doe
- Christian Ayala, Shaw v. Reno
- Aja Brofferio, O'Connor v. Board of Education
- Dan Campbell, Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music
- Danial Ceasar, Everson v. Board of Education
- Karen Chen, Ex parte Milligan
- Elizabeth Eggert, Victor v. Nebraska
- Jack Flannery, Escobedo v. Illinois
- Vikrant Jain, US v. Bhagat Singh Thind
- Julia Keinan, Hirabayashi v. US
- Jessica Laird, Gratz v. Bollinger
- Willy Leach, Pierce v. Society of Sisters
- Blake Li, Graham v. Richardson
- Linda Lin, US v. Wong Kim Ark
- Yi Luo, Hendrick Hudson District Board of Education v. Rowley
- Margot Penn, NCAA v. Smith
- Felipe Peterson, Ozawa v. United States
- Samuel Pitcavage, San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez
- Sridhar Poddar, Afroyim v. Rusk
- Elena Segarra, Ex parte Merryman
- Ben Tillotson, Jacobson v. Massachusetts
- Kyle Weiss, FEC v. Wisconsin Right to Life
- Danmai Xiang, Chae Chan Ping v. US
- Nikki Yea, Texas v. Johnson
Your sources may include specialized references such as The Almanac of American Politics, but do not cite general-purpose encyclopedias such as Encyclopaedia Britannica and Encyclopedia Americana. And especially do not count on Wikipedia, which is sometimes unreliable. (You might be able to get leads from Wikipedia, but then go elsewhere for verification and citable sources.) In your answer, you should not merely identify persons or concepts. You should also explain the subject matter’s political significance.
You may find relevant links here.
- Essays should be typed (12-point), stapled, double-spaced, and no more than four pages long. I will not read past the fourth page.
- Put your name on a cover sheet that is blank on the reverse side. Do not identify yourself on the text pages.
- Cite your sources with endnotes, which should be in a standard style (e.g., Turabian or Chicago Manual of Style). Endnote pages do not count against the page limit.
- Watch your spelling, grammar, diction, and punctuation. Errors will count against you.
- Return essays by the start of class, Wednesday, March 7. Late essays will drop a gradepoint for one day's lateness, a letter grade after that. I will grant no extensions except for illness or emergency.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)