This blog serves the our introductory course on American politics (Claremont McKenna College Government 20) for the spring of 2025. During the semester, I shall post course material and students will comment on it. Students are also free to comment on any aspect of American politics, either current or historical. There are only two major limitations: no coarse language, and no derogatory comments about people at the Claremont Colleges.
Showing posts with label federalism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label federalism. Show all posts
Tuesday, February 14, 2012
Federalism and Marijuana
In the Bessette/Pitney blog, there is an article about the Justice Department's decision not to prosecute marijuana growers and suppliers that comply with their states' laws. In it, Kleiman states that "the regulation of medical practice is a state and not a federal responsibility." On what does he base that assertion?
Tuesday, January 31, 2012
On the election of Senators
Article 3, Section II of the Constitution says that each State legislature is in charge of choosing its federal Senators. One rationale for this is provided in Federalist #9, which claims that it makes the states "constituent parts of the national sovereignty, by allowing them a direct representation in the Senate." The 17th Amendment reversed this, however, making Senators subject to a direct popular vote.
Why was the 17th Amendment passed? What might the Founding Fathers say about it? How were the politics of the Senate changed as a result of it?
Why was the 17th Amendment passed? What might the Founding Fathers say about it? How were the politics of the Senate changed as a result of it?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)