Proposition 29 plans to
increase the tax on a pack of cigarettes in California by a dollar to use the tax-generated
revenue on cancer research.
David
F. Veneziano of the San Fransisco Chronicle supports Prop. 29 because he feels that
increasing the price of tobacco would reduce the number of people consuming it,
and thus reduce smoking. He feels that it is important to spend on cancer
research because of its potential to save lives.
This
editorial from the LA Times opposes
Prop. 29 arguing that the National Institute of Health (NIH) already spends
enough on cancer research. In addition California has more pressing areas to
spend on, such as: retaining K-12 teachers, keeping parks open, public college
education, health care for the infirm, and medical care for the poor.
No comments:
Post a Comment